切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 171 -177. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2024.02.010

临床研究

火把花根片联合黄葵胶囊治疗高或极高进展风险糖尿病肾病的临床探索
谭莹1, 朱鹏飞2, 李楠2, 黄莉吉2, 周希乔2, 严倩华2, 余江毅1,()   
  1. 1. 210004 南京,江苏省中医院内分泌科;210023 南京,南京中医药大学第一临床医学院
    2. 210004 南京,江苏省中医院内分泌科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-12 出版日期:2024-02-15
  • 通信作者: 余江毅
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82174293); 国家自然科学基金青年项目(82004286); 国家自然科学基金青年项目(82104751); 江苏省中医药科技发展计划重点项目(ZD202208); 江苏省中医药科技发展计划项目(ZT202206)

Effectiveness of Huobahuagen tablets in combination with Huangkui capsules in diabetic kidney disease patients with high or extremely high risk of disease progression

Ying Tan1, Pengfei Zhu2, Nan Li2, Liji Huang2, Xiqiao Zhou2, Qianhua Yan2, Jiangyi Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210004, China;The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
    2. Department of Endocrinology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210004, China
  • Received:2023-08-12 Published:2024-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Jiangyi Yu
引用本文:

谭莹, 朱鹏飞, 李楠, 黄莉吉, 周希乔, 严倩华, 余江毅. 火把花根片联合黄葵胶囊治疗高或极高进展风险糖尿病肾病的临床探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 171-177.

Ying Tan, Pengfei Zhu, Nan Li, Liji Huang, Xiqiao Zhou, Qianhua Yan, Jiangyi Yu. Effectiveness of Huobahuagen tablets in combination with Huangkui capsules in diabetic kidney disease patients with high or extremely high risk of disease progression[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 171-177.

目的

探讨火把花根片联合黄葵胶囊治疗高或极高进展风险糖尿病肾病患者的临床疗效及安全性。

方法

将江苏省中医院2021年3月至2023年3月门诊或病房收治的高或极高进展风险的糖尿病肾病患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各55例。对照组给予黄葵胶囊治疗,观察组在对照组治疗的基础上联合火把花根片治疗,2组均治疗6个月。比较2组治疗前后的尿微量蛋白/肌酐比值(UACR)、估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、血肌酐、胱抑素C、肾功能及尿蛋白的疗效评估及不良反应情况。

结果

观察组治疗后UACR和血肌酐下降,eGFR升高(P均<0.05),胱抑素C呈下降趋势,但无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组治疗后UACR、血肌酐和eGFR均呈下降趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05),胱抑素C上升(P<0.05)。观察组UACR、eGFR、胱抑素C治疗前后的改善幅度(ΔUACR、ΔeGFR和Δ胱抑素C)均明显优于对照组(P均<0.05)。在肾功能疗效评估方面,治疗后观察组显效14例,有效8例,稳定18例,无效12例,总有效率为76.92%;对照组显效6例,有效6例,稳定11例,无效28例,总有效率为45.1%;2组总有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在尿蛋白疗效评估方面,治疗后观察组近期缓解14例,显效10例,有效16例,无效12例,总有效率为76.92%;对照组近期缓解8例,显效6例,有效19例,无效18例,总有效率为64.71%;观察组治疗蛋白尿的总有效率高于对照组,但差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。在安全性评价中,观察组患者与对照组患者的不良反应率无明显统计学意义(7.69% vs 3.92%,P>0.05)。

结论

火把花根片联合黄葵胶囊对高或极高进展风险的糖尿病肾病患者临床疗效显著,安全性较好,在降低尿蛋白和保护肾功能方面具有显著优势,值得临床推广。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Huobahuagen tablets combined with Huangkui capsules in treating diabetic kidney disease patients with a high or extremely high risk of disease progression.

Methods

Diabetic kidney disease patients with a high or extremely high risk of disease progression admitted to the outpatient ward of Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2021 to March 2023 were included as the research subjects. They were randomly divided into either a control group or an observation group, with 55 cases in each group. The control group was treated with Huangkui capsules alone, while the observation group was treated with Huobahuagen tablets combined with Huangkui capsules. Both groups were treated for six months. The efficacy with regard to urine microalbumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood creatinine, cystatin C, renal function, and urinary protein was compared between the two groups. Adverse reactions were also compared.

Results

After treatment, UACR and blood creatinine decreased significantly, eGFR increased significantly (P<0.05), and cystatin C showed a decreasing trend in the observation group, but there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). In contrast, UACR, blood creatinine, and eGFR showed a downward trend in the control group after treatment, though the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05), and cystatin C increased significantly (P<0.05). The improvement of UACR, eGFR, and cystatin C (ΔUACR, ΔeGFR, and ΔCystatin C) after treatment in the observation group (ΔUACR, ΔeGFR, and ΔCystatin C) were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05). In terms of renal function, the observation group had 14 cases of significant improvement, 8 cases of improvement, 18 cases of no significant change, and 12 cases of ineffectiveness after treatment, with a total effective rate of 76.92%. In the control group, 6 cases showed significant improvement, 6 were effective, 11 were stable, and 28 were ineffective, with a total effective rate of 45.1%. The difference in overall effective rate with regard to renal function between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). In terms of urinary protein, in the observation group after treatment, there were 14 cases of short-term remission, 10 cases of significant improvement, 16 cases of effectiveness, and 12 cases of ineffectiveness, with a total effective rate of 76.92%. In the control group, there were eight cases of short-term remission, 6 cases of significant improvement, 19 cases of effectiveness, and 18 cases of ineffectiveness, with a total effective rate of 64.71%. The overall effective rate with regard to proteinuria in the observation group was higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse reaction rate between the observation and control groups (7.69% vs 3.92%, P>0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of Huobahuagen tablets and Huangkui capsules has significant clinical efficacy and safety in treating diabetic nephropathy patients with a high or extremely high risk of disease progression. The combination treatment has significant advantages in reducing urinary protein and protecting renal function.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者治疗前后肾功能指标比较
表3 2组治疗前后肾功能的疗效比较
表4 患者治疗前后尿蛋白指标比较
表5 2组治疗前后蛋白尿的疗效比较[例(%)]
1
中华医学会糖尿病学分会微血管并发症学组. 中国糖尿病肾脏病防治指南(2021年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13(8): 762-784.
2
Zheng W, Guo J, Liu ZS. Effects of metabolic memory on inflammation and fibrosis associated with diabetic kidney disease: an epigenetic perspective[J]. Clin Epigenetics, 2021, 13(1): 87.
3
Gembillo G, Ingrasciotta Y, Crisafulli S, et al. Kidney disease in diabetic patients: from pathophysiology to pharmacological aspects with a focus on therapeutic inertia[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(9): 4824.
4
钟颖, 赵潇, 赵建权, 等. 火把花根片药理作用及临床应用研究进展[J]. 药物评价研究, 2021, 44(9): 2020-2027.
5
孟元, 赵文景, 王雨, 等. 《糖尿病肾病病证结合诊疗指南》解读[J]. 现代中医药, 2023, 43(1): 19-23.
6
中国高血压防治指南修订委员会. 中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2019, 24(1): 24-56.
7
杨霓芝, 刘旭生. 糖尿病肾病诊断、辨证分型及疗效评定标准(试行方案)[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2007, (7): 7-8.
8
赵进喜, 王世东, 李靖, 等. 糖尿病肾脏病分期辨证规范与疗效评定方案及其研究[J]. 世界中医药, 2017, 12(1): 1-4.
9
Wang L, Peng W, Zhao Z, et al. Prevalence and treatment of diabetes in China, 2013-2018[J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(24): 2498-2506.
10
Wang HY, Ding GH, Lin H, et al. Influence of doctors' perception on the diagnostic status of chronic kidney disease: results from 976 409 individuals with electronic health records in China[J]. Clin Kidney J, 2021, 14(11): 2428-2436.
11
Evans M, Lewis RD, Morgan AR, et al. A narrative review of chronic kidney disease in clinical practice: current challenges and future perspectives[J]. Adv Ther, 2022, 39(1): 33-43.
12
毛玉熠, 李格菲, 韩睿. microRNAs调控糖尿病肾病发展的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(2): 133-138.
13
Chen YZ, Gong ZX, Cai GY, et al. Efficacy and safety of flos abelmoschus manihot (Malvaceae) on type 2 diabetic nephropathy: A systematic review[J]. Chin J Integr Med, 2015, 21(6): 464-472.
14
Zhao J, Tostivint I, Xu L, et al. Efficacy of combined abelmoschus manihot and Irbesartan for reduction of albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease: A multicenter randomized double-blind parallel controlled clinical trial[J]. Diabetes Care, 2022, 45(7): e113-e115.
15
熊阔海, 高天舒. 火把花根片治疗糖尿病肾病的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 中医临床研究, 2022, 14(1): 136-140.
16
Ilyas Z, Chaiban JT, Krikorian A. Novel insights into the pathophysiology and clinical aspects of diabetic nephropathy[J]. Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 2017, 18(1): 21-28.
17
Tuttle KR, Agarwal R, Alpers CE, et al. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for diabetic kidney disease[J]. Kidney Int, 2022, 102(2): 248-260.
18
Rayego-Mateos S, Rodrigues-Diez RR, Fernandez-Fernandez B, et al. Targeting inflammation to treat diabetic kidney disease: the road to 2030[J]. Kidney Int, 2023, 103(2): 282-296.
19
Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P, Perna A, et al. Continuum of renoprotection with losartan at all stages of type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a post hoc analysis of the RENAAL trial results[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15(12): 3117-3125.
20
Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345(12): 851-860.
21
Gæde P, Oellgaard J, Carstensen B, et al. Years of life gained by multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: 21 years follow-up on the Steno-2 randomised trial[J]. Diabetologia, 2016, 59(11): 2298-2307.
22
Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10225): 709-733.
23
王攀君, 朱琳, 安晓飞. 火把花根片治疗2型糖尿病肾病研究进展[J]. 河南中医, 2023, 43(4): 617-624.
24
Zhao J, Zhang F, Xiao X, et al. Tripterygium hypoglaucum (Levl.) hutch and its main bioactive components: recent advances in pharmacological activity, pharmacokinetics and potential toxicity[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2021, 12715359.
25
王碧娟, 宋李桃, 吕祎琪, 等. 雷公藤甲素对局灶节段性肾小球硬化足细胞损伤的调控机制[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2021, 36(3): 1722-1726.
26
Qu Z, Liu A, Li P, et al. Advances in physiological functions and mechanisms of (-)-epicatechin[J]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2021, 61(2): 211-233.
27
Cordero-Herrera I, Chen X, Ramos S, et al. (-)-Epicatechin attenuates high-glucose-induced inflammation by epigenetic modulation in human monocytes[J]. Eur J Nutr, 2017, 56(3): 1369-1373.
28
潘祥, 王均伟, 胡立宏. 雷公藤甲素前药的研究进展[J]. 南京中医药大学学报, 2020, 36(5): 684-689.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 钟文涛, 吕远, 孙亮, 袁强, 聂玉辉, 东星, 陈光, 陈纲, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜-胃镜联合手术与开腹手术处理胃间质瘤的临床疗效对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 164-166.
[3] 袁宝玉, 管义祥, 王东流, 陆正. 不同时机颅骨修补术治疗颅脑外伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 35-41.
[4] 石颖, 胡静, 刘佩本, 王婷婷, 左祥荣, 曹权. CAZ-AVI与多黏菌素B治疗重症CRKP肺炎患者的效果及安全性比较[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 16-24.
[5] 周军, 赵志明, 刘运锋, 唐兆伟, 宋常华, 刘杰, 李浩然, 吴绍光. 神经内镜下脑室血肿清除术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室内出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 86-92.
[6] 刘萍, 刘占举, 张萃. 英夫利西单抗治疗克罗恩病的临床疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 28-34.
[7] 葛雪梅. SOX与mFOLFOX6化疗方案对晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 67-71.
[8] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[9] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[10] 余海峰, 聂艳芳, 陈孜炜, 李春胜. 不同剂量火把花根片降低蛋白的尿疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 166-170.
[11] 施月, 石秀杰, 赵明明, 张一凡, 张琪, 欧阳嘉慧, 段行宇, 柳菁, 张昱. 火把花根片治疗慢性肾小球肾炎的荟萃分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1233-1240.
[12] 杨思齐, 王天蒙, 王耀光. 火把花根片联合益肾消浊方治疗脾肾气虚兼湿浊型慢性肾小球肾炎的临床观察[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1241-1246.
[13] 黄莉吉, 王婷, 朱鹏飞, 刘敬顺, 余江毅, 谢绍锋. 芪葵颗粒联合火把花根片对G3A3期糖尿病肾病的疗效及对血清miRNA-21的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1247-1252.
[14] 邬秋俊, 向茜. 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与2型糖尿病微血管并发症相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1109-1112.
[15] 王勇, 王丽. 导管接触性溶栓治疗下肢深静脉血栓安全性和有效性的系统评价再评价[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 58-63.
阅读次数
全文


摘要