Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (21): 2349-2356. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.21.001

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches •     Next Articles

Parameter optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer

Li Chen1, Mi Liu2,(), Xianfu Li1, Weike Tian2, Xiaoqing Zhao3   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637100, China
    2. Health Management Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637100, China
    3. North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637100, China
  • Received:2017-03-23 Online:2017-11-01 Published:2017-11-01
  • Contact: Mi Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Mi, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To optimize the parameters of Monaco planning system based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer.

Methods

Eleven esophageal cancer patients treated at the Radiotherapy Department of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were selected and included in this study. Under specified conditions, all the patients underwent CT simulation. The physicists set the optimization parameters, changed the number of radiation fields to establish different IMRT plans, and analyzed the data on tumor target volume, organs at risk, and normal tissue of different plans to obtain the optimal radiotherapy plan.

Results

The three-field radiotherapy plan had significantly lower V95% (a PTV1 volume parameter) than the other radiotherapy plans (P<0.05). The volume parameters and dose parameters of PTV2 in each IMRT plan had no significant difference (P>0.05). The thyroid gland, trachea, and spinal cord in different irradiation field plans had no significant difference in risk. The irradiated volume of the lungs was the largest in the V10, V20, and V30 three-field plan, and smaller in the five-, seven-, and nine-field plans (P<0.05). Among the IMRT plans, the nine-field plan had the longest therapy time and the poorest therapeutic effect (P>0.05). The undefined normal tissue was larger in the V20, V30, V40, and V50 three-field plan than in the other plans (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the plan at V5, V10, and V60, (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Using the Elekta Monaco 3.2 IMRT radiotherapy planning system and selecting the size of 4.000 cm2 as the minimum field, the area of 3.000 cm2 as the minimum change, 0.60 cm as the minimum width of leaf, and 6 MU as the minimum hop number, the five-field and seven-field plans are more suitable than the others in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer.

Key words: Esophageal cancer, IMRT, Radiotherapy plan, Radiation fields

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-57830845 E-mail: zhlcyszz@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd