Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01): 50-54. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.01.011

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions without fluoroscopic monitoring

Shijie Li1, Mailin Chen2, Wanpu Yan3, Chao Lv3, Xiangju Li4, Li Sun4, Qi Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Endoscopy Center of Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
    2. Department of Medical Imaging , Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
    3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
    4. Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
  • Received:2018-10-14 Online:2019-01-01 Published:2019-01-01
  • Contact: Qi Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Qi, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) without fluoroscopic monitoring.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 52 patients with PPLs who underwent EBUS-GS at Peking University Cancer Hospital from March 2016 to February 2017. Their clinicopathologic data and complications were assessed. According to diagnostic ratio, categorical data are presented as frequencies and were analyzed using the chi-square test.

Results

There were 26 men and 26 women in this group, with a mean age of 55.6±10.0 years (range, 22-78 years). A total of 52 PPLs were examined, of which 47 could be detected by EBUS. The overall diagnostic yield of EBUS-GS was 75.0% (39/52). The diagnostic yield for malignancy was higher than that for benign lesions (82.2% vs 28.6%, χ2=6.658, P=0.010). The combination of transbronchial lung biopsy, brush smear, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid provided higher diagnostic yield than any singer way (80.4% vs 33.3%, χ2=4.019, P=0.045). Factors that significantly affected and predicted diagnostic success were EBUS probe within the lesion (85.3% vs 55.6%, χ2=4.078, P=0.043) and PPLs located in the central two-thirds of the lung (86.1% vs 50.0%, χ2=5.898, P=0.015). There was no significant difference in the diagnosis rate among lung lobes and lesion sizes measured by CT, and the learning curve also had no significant impact on the diagnosis rate. One (1.9%) patient suffered from intraoperative bleeding which could be managed under endoscopy. Seven (13.5%) patients had transient hypoxemia during surgery, which was relieved after improving the nasal catheter oxygen flow. Twenty-two (42.3%) patients had a small amount of bloody sputum within 24 h after surgery, but no special treatments were needed.

Conclusion

EBUS-GS without fluoroscopic monitoring for PPLs is an effective and safe procedure.

Key words: Pulmonary peripheral lesions, Bronchoscopy, Ultrasonography, Virtual bronchoscopy

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-57830845 E-mail: zhlcyszz@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd