Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01): 74-78. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.01.016

Special Issue:

• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles    

Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for treatment of II-III degree mixed hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis

Ying Wei1, Fulin Lin1,(), Yu Hong1, Xian Shao1   

  1. 1. Department of Anorectal Surgery, Chinese People′s Liberation Army Joint Service Support Unit 903 Hospital, Hangzhou 310013, China
  • Received:2018-12-26 Online:2019-01-01 Published:2019-01-01
  • Contact: Fulin Lin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lin Fulin, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and rubber band ligation (RBL) in the treatment ofⅡ-Ⅲ degree mixed hemorrhoids.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE by computer and other sources to retrieve relevant controlled trials (including randomized controlled trials) that compared DG-HAL and RBL for the treatment of II-III degree mixed hemorrhoids. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed by two independent reviewers according to the protocol. The χ2 test was used for assessing the heterogeneity among the included studies. When there was no statistical homogeneity among the studies (P>0.1, I2<50%), the fixed-effect model was used for analysis. If there was statistical heterogeneity among the studies (P<0.1, I2>50%), the heterogeneity sources were analyzed, and subgroup analysis was performed according to the reasons that may lead to heterogeneity. When there was a sufficient similarity between the studies in the subgroup and between the subgroups (subgroup P>0.1, I2<50%), the fixed-effect model was used for meta-analysis; if there was statistical heterogeneity between subgroups but the clinical heterogeneity or difference was not statistically significant, the random-effects model was used for analysis; if the heterogeneity between subgroups was too large, a descriptive analysis was performed.

Results

Three controlled trials were finally included, involving 674 patients with 425 cases undergoing DG-HAL (DG-HAL group) and 249 cases undergoing RBL (RBL group). Meta-analysis showed that the 6-week recurrence rate in the RBL group was significantly higher than that of the DG-HAL group (OR=0.23, 95%CI: 0.11-0.45, P<0.05), but the 1-year recurrence rate had no significance difference (OR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.24-3.92, P>0.05). Regarding the degree of postoperative wound cleansing, the DG-HAL group was significantly better than the RBL group (OR=0.17, 95%CI: 0.09-0.33, P<0.001). The postoperative complications and adverse reactions including bleeding, pain, urinary retention, mucus discharge, vasovagal upset postoperative had no significant differences between the two groups (bleeding: P=0.05; others: P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with RBL, DG-HAL therapy is safe and effective in treatment of Ⅱ-Ⅲ degree mixed hemorrhoids; however, its long-term safety requires further verification by more RCTs with large sample size and of high-quality.

Key words: Hemorrhoids, Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation, Rubber band ligation, Meta-analysis

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-57830845 E-mail: zhlcyszz@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd