Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (12): 888-892. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.12.002

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical effects of ultrasonography-guided corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy in lateral epicondylitis

Xiaowen Huang1, Guqi Hong1, Jin Fan1, Mengjie Wu2, Jing Hang2, Xiaojing Peng2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), Nanjing 210029, China
    2. Department of Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2019-05-09 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-06-15
  • Contact: Xiaojing Peng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Peng Xiaojing, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of ultrasonography (USG)-guided corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in lateral epicondylitis.

Methods

A total of 61 patients with lateral epicondylitis were recruited from the outpatient department of orthopedics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July to October 2018 in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups (A and B) according to the treatment method used. USG-guided corticosteroid injection was performed in group A with 31 patients. ESWT was performed in group B with 30 patients. The t-test was used to compare the difference in visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, and patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) between the two groups, and the Chi-square test was used to compare the recurrence rate.

Results

The patients were followed for an average duration of (7.2±0.9) months. One month after treatment, the VAS score in group A was significantly lower than that in group B [(1.8±0.4) vs (3.2±0.5), t=12.0959, P<0.001]. No significant differences were found in VAS and PRTEE scores at 3 months post-treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS [(1.7±0.3) vs (2.8±0.4), t=-12.1772, P<0.001] and PRTEE [(13.2±2.9) vs (22.3±5.1), t=-8.6024, P<0.001] scores as well as grip strength [(12.3±2.5)% vs (28.4±3.2)%, t=-21.9381, P<0.001] and recurrence rate [0/31 vs 4/30, χ2=4.4234, P=0.035] at 6 months post-treatment [(12.3±2.5)% vs (28.4±3.2)%; 0/31 vs 4/30] were significantly lower in group A than in group B.

Conclusion

For patients with lateral epicondylitis, USG-guided corticosteroid injection is an efficient treating method compared with ESWT. However, ESWT is an alternative method with the advantages of non-invasiveness and high safety.

Key words: Ultrasonography-guided, Corticosteroid, Extracorporeal shockwave therapy, Lateral epicondylitis, Tennis elbow

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-57830845 E-mail: zhlcyszz@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd