切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (08) : 440 -444. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2018.08.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

扩张型心肌病与缺血性心肌病患者冠心病危险因素、血脂及心脏超声特征对比分析
陈纯娟1, 王伟1, 余伟1,()   
  1. 1. 515041 汕头大学医学院第二附属医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-29 出版日期:2018-04-15
  • 通信作者: 余伟

Comparative analysis of risk factors for coronary heart disease, serum lipid levels, and echocardiographic features between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy

Chunjuan Chen1, Wei Wang1, Wei Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
  • Received:2017-12-29 Published:2018-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Wei Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Wei, Email:
引用本文:

陈纯娟, 王伟, 余伟. 扩张型心肌病与缺血性心肌病患者冠心病危险因素、血脂及心脏超声特征对比分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(08): 440-444.

Chunjuan Chen, Wei Wang, Wei Yu. Comparative analysis of risk factors for coronary heart disease, serum lipid levels, and echocardiographic features between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(08): 440-444.

目的

对比分析扩张型心肌病(DCM)和缺血性心肌病(ICM)患者冠心病危险因素、血脂以及心脏超声特征,为基层医师诊断和初步鉴别这两种心脏疾病提供参考。

方法

入选2015年1月至2017年8月在汕头大学医学院第二附属医院心内科住院的心脏扩大且合并左室收缩功能降低的53例患者,患者均行冠状动脉造影。按照冠状动脉造影结果将患者分为DCM组(34例,33~79岁)和ICM组(19例,41~77岁),回顾性分析两组患者冠心病危险因素、血脂及心脏超声特征。采用χ2检验比较两组患者年龄构成情况、冠心病危险因素(性别、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟史)构成情况、右心系统增大构成情况,采用t检验比较血脂检查结果(总胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)和超声检查结果[左心房直径、左心室舒张末期内径(LVd)、左心室收缩末期内径(LVs)、射血分数]。

结果

在年龄构成方面:DCM组中青年患者(<40岁)比例明显高于ICM组,差异具有统计学意义(20.59% vs 0,χ2=4.51,P=0.034);而DCM组老年患者(≥60岁)比例明显低于ICM组,差异具有统计学意义(32.35% vs 68.42%,χ2=6.40,P=0.011)。在冠心病危险因素方面,所有心脏扩大患者中,男性患者占所有患者的81.13%;但是DCM组和ICM组在男性比例方面差异无统计学意义(82.35% vs 78.95%,χ2=0.09,P=0.761);ICM组患者合并高血压、糖尿病的比例均明显高于DCM组,差异具有统计学意义(73.68% vs 38.24%,χ2=6.13,P=0.013;52.63% vs 20.59%,χ2=5.74,P=0.017);DCM组和ICM组患者吸烟史比例差异无统计学意义(58.82% vs 57.89%,χ2=0.00,P=0.948)。在血脂水平方面,DCM组和ICM组患者甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平差异无统计学意义[(1.26±0.59)mmol/L vs (1.46±1.02)mmol/L,t=-0.91,P=0.369;(1.02±0.40)mmol/L vs (1.06±0.27) mmol/L,t=-0.39,P=0.699];DCM组患者总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低于ICM组,差异具有统计学意义[(4.37±1.10) mmol/L vs (5.23±1.32)mmol/L,t=-2.54,P=0.014;(2.80±0.82)mmol/L vs (3.43±1.02)mmol/L,t=-2.46,P=0.018]。在心脏超声检查方面,DCM组患者左心系统扩大程度较ICM组明显,DCM组患者左心房直径、LVd、LVs均大于ICM组,差异具有统计学意义[(43.29±6.19)mm vs(38.58±4.82)mm,t=2.86,P=0.006;(65.94±7.30)mm vs(58.94±9.16)mm,t=3.05,P=0.004;(54.68±8.43)mm vs (48.16±7.61)mm,t=2.79,P=0.007];DCM组患者与ICM患者比较,右心系统扩大的比例更高,差异具有统计学意义(44.12% vs 15.79%,χ2=4.36,P=0.037),射血分数下降更为明显,差异具有统计学意义[(31.65±7.18)% vs (36.89±9.10)%,t=-2.31,P=0.025]。

结论

综合分析冠心病危险因素、血脂及心脏超声特征可初步鉴别DCM和ICM。

Objective

To compare the risk factors for coronary heart disease, blood lipids, and echocardiographic features between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) to help doctors in primary hospitals diagnose and identify the two heart diseases.

Methods

Fifty-three patients treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from January 2015 to August 2017 were divided into a DCM group (33-79 years old, 34 cases) and an ICM group (41-77 years old, 19 cases). All patients had cardiac enlargement and underwent coronary angiography to confirm coronary artery disease. The risk factors for coronary heart disease, blood lipids, and echocardiographic characteristics were analyzed.

Results

In terms of age composition, the proportion of young and middle-aged patients (<40 years old) in the DCM group was significantly higher than that in the ICM group (20.59% vs 0, χ2=4.51, P=0.034). However, the proportion of old patients (≥60 years old) in the DCM group was significantly lower than that in the ICM group (32.35% vs 68.42%, χ2=6.40, P=0.011). Regarding risk factors for coronary heart disease, male patients accounted for 81.13% of all patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of male patients between the DCM group and ICM group (82.35% vs 78.95%, χ2=0.09, P=0.761). The proportion of patients with hypertension and diabetes in the ICM group was significantly higher than that in the DCM group (73.68% vs 38.24%, χ2=6.13, P=0.013; 52.63% vs 20.59%, χ2=5.74, P=0.017), but the rate of patients with smoking had no significant difference between the two groups (58.82% vs 57.89%, χ2=0.00, P=0.948)). With regard to blood lipid levels, there was no significant difference in the levels of triglycerides or high density lipoprotein cholesterol between the two groups [(1.26±0.59) mmol/L vs (1.46±1.02) mmol/L, t=-0.91, P=0.369; (1.02±0.40) mmol/L vs (1.06±0.27) mmol/L, t=-0.39, P=0.699]. The levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the DCM group were significantly lower than those in the ICM group [(4.37±1.10) mmol/L vs (5.23±1.32) mmol/L, t=-2.54, P=0.014; (2.80±0.82) mmol/L vs (3.43±1.02) mmol/L, t=-2.46, P=0.018)]. In terms of echocardiographic features, the left ventricular system expansion degree of patients in the DCM group was significantly greater than that in the ICM group. The left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and left ventricular end-systolic diameter of patients in the DCM group were all larger than those in the ICM group [(43.29±6.19) mm vs (38.58±4.82) mm, t=2.86, P=0.006; (65.94±7.30) mm vs (58.94±9.16) mm, t=3.05, P=0.004; (54.68±8.43) mm vs (48.16±7.61) mm, t=2.79, P=0.007)]. Compared with the ICM group, patients in the DCM group had higher proportion of right heart system enlargement(44.12% vs 15.79%, χ2=4.36, P=0.037), but the ejection fraction was mostly decreased [(31.65±7.18)% vs (36.89±9.10)%, t=-2.31, P=0.025]).

Conclusion

Comprehensive analysis of risk factors for coronary heart disease, blood lipids, and echocardiography features can be used to identify DCM and ICM.

表1 DCM组与ICM组患者年龄构成比较[例(%)]
表2 DCM组与ICM组患者冠心病危险因素比较[例(%)]
表3 DCM组与ICM组患者血脂水平比较(mmol/L,±s
表4 DCM组与ICM组患者心脏结构、心功能比较
1
中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会,中国心肌病诊断与治疗建议工作组. 心肌病诊断与治疗建议[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2007, 35(1):5-16.
2
Topol EJ. 心血管病学[M]. 2版. 高润霖, 杨跃进, 译. 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 2007: 1730-1732.
3
蔡丽华. C反应蛋白鉴别扩张型心肌病与缺血性心肌病的价值[J]. 心血管康复医学杂志, 2005, 14(4):379-380.
4
侯跃双,何亚乐,黄新胜, 等. 扩张型心肌病与缺血性心肌病超声形态学对比分析(附53例冠脉造影结果) [J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 1999, 19(9):530-532.
5
马欢,李梅,汪萍, 等. 冠心病危险因素在不同性别患者中的分布[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2012, 32(2):390-391.
6
陈纯娟,余伟,王伟. 中青年和老年急性心肌梗死患者危险因素及血脂对比分析[J].中国当代医药, 2015, 22(10):44-46, 49.
7
中国成人血脂异常防治指南制订联合委员会.中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2007, 35(5):390-419.
8
姚武位,陈庆伟. 高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与冠心病的相关性研究[J]. 心血管病学进展, 2009, 30(2):253-256.
9
蒙应东,陈海燕,陈英丽,等. 扩张型心肌病与缺血性心肌病患者的血糖、血脂水平比较及其与心功能的关系[J]. 广东医科大学学报, 2017, 35(1):38-40.
10
刘翠红,王蕾,赵可辉, 等. 超声心动图对缺血性心肌病和扩张型心肌病的鉴别诊断[J]. 中国实用医药, 2009, 4(2):14-15.
11
Schaper J, Froede R, Hein S, et al. Impairment of the myocardial ultrastructure and changes of the cytoskeleton in dilated cardiomyopathy [J]. Circulation, 1991, 83(2):504-514.
12
康健. 彩超对扩张型心肌病与缺血性心肌病对比分析[J]. 广州医药, 2006, 37(2):55-56.
13
Gheorghiade M, Bonow RO. Chronic heart failure in the United States: a manifestation of coronary artery disease [J].Circulation, 1998, 97(3):282-289.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 黄应雄, 叶子, 蒋鹏, 詹红, 姚陈, 崔冀. 急性肠系膜静脉血栓形成致透壁性肠坏死的临床危险因素分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 413-421.
[4] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[5] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[6] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[7] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[8] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[9] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[10] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 王行舟, 沈晓菲, 喻春钊. 造口旁疝危险因素预测模型构建[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 682-687.
[11] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[12] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[13] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[14] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[15] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
阅读次数
全文


摘要