切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 266 -271. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.04.005

所属专题: 急危重症 文献

临床研究

143例ICU老年创伤患者的流行病学分析
敬慧丹1, 李洪超1, 蒋东坡1, 艾山木1,()   
  1. 1. 400042 重庆,陆军军医大学大坪医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-29 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 通信作者: 艾山木

Epidemiological characteristics of 143 elderly trauma patients in intensive care unit

Huidan Jing1, Hongchao Li1, Dongpo Jiang1, Shanmu Ai1,()   

  1. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
  • Received:2018-12-29 Published:2019-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Shanmu Ai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ai Shanmu, Email:
引用本文:

敬慧丹, 李洪超, 蒋东坡, 艾山木. 143例ICU老年创伤患者的流行病学分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 266-271.

Huidan Jing, Hongchao Li, Dongpo Jiang, Shanmu Ai. Epidemiological characteristics of 143 elderly trauma patients in intensive care unit[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 266-271.

目的

探讨单中心老年创伤重症患者流行病学特点,为临床救治提供参考。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年6月陆军军医大学大坪医院重症医学科(ICU)收治的65岁以上老年创伤患者143例,分析患者性别、年龄、致伤机制、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、并发症、住院时间等资料。采用Mann-Whitney检验比较ISS评分、急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHE Ⅱ评分)、ICU时间、住院时间在不同受伤机制和不同年龄之间的差异,使用Pearson χ2检验比较年龄分层计数、基础疾病分类计数、好转出院例数在不同受伤机制和不同年龄之间的差异,应用Logistic回归分析法分析并发症发生的危险因素。

结果

所有创伤患者中,男性患者71例(49.65%,71/143),女性72例(50.34%,72/143);年龄65~99岁,平均年龄(78±1)岁;多发伤43例(30.07%,43/143),单部位伤100例(69.93%,100/143)。跌倒伤是首位致伤原因90例(62.94%,90/143),其次为车祸伤40例(27.97%,40/143)。跌倒伤ISS[9(9,9)分vs 22(16,27)分,Z=7.574,P<0.001]、APACHE II评分[15(14,17)分vs 17(15,21)分,P=0.001]均较低,住ICU时间[2(1,3)d vs 8(1,16)d,Z=4.407,P<0.001]和住院时间[(16(12,22.25)d vs 30(19,49)d,Z=4.779,P<0.001)]较非跌倒伤更短,好转出院率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。≥80岁患者与<80岁患者比较,APACHE Ⅱ评分明显升高[16(15,20)分vs 14(15,18)分,Z=2.093,P=0.036)],住ICU的时间更长[3(1,10)d vs 1(1,7.5)d,Z=2.013,P=0.044]。APACHE Ⅱ评分是并发症发生的危险因素(OR=1.771,P=0.01)。

结论

老年患者入住ICU的主要原因是跌倒伤,其次是车祸伤。除年龄外,APACHE Ⅱ评分高时,住ICU时间更长和并发症发生率更高。

Objective

To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of elderly critical trauma patients in a single center to provide a reference for clinical treatment.

Methods

The clinical data of 143 elderly patients (age 65 years or older) admitted to Daping Hospital from January 2017 to June 2018 were collected. The patient's gender, age, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), pre-existing medical conditions, and hospital length of stay were analyzed. The Mann-Whitney test was utilized to compare the differences in ISS score, APACHE Ⅱ score, ICU time, and hospital stay between different injury mechanisms and ages. The Pearson χ2 test was used to compare age stratification, underlying disease classification, and number of cases with condition improvement and discharge between different injury mechanisms and ages. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to analyze the risk factors for complications.

Results

There were 71 male cases (49.65%, 71/143) and 72 females (50.34%, 72/143). The patients ranged in age from 65 to 99 years, with a mean age of (78±1) years. Of all cases, 43 (30.07%, 43/143) had multiple injuries and 100 (69.93%, 100/143) had single-site injuries. Tumble injuries were the first cause of injury (62.94%, 90/143), followed by traffic accidental injuries (27.97%, 40/143). Compared with non-tumble injuries, the ISS [9 (9, 9) vs 22 (16, 27), Z=7.574, P<0.001] and APACHE Ⅱ scores [15 (14, 17) vs 17 (15, 21), P=0.001] of tumble injuries were significantly lower, but the ICU time [2(1, 3) d vs 8 (1, 16) d, Z=4.407, P<0.001] and hospital stay [16 (12, 22.25) d vs 30 (19, 49) d, Z=4.779, P<0.001] were significantly shorter, although there was no significant difference in the rate of improvement and discharge (P>0.05). Patients with an age of 80 or older had a higher APACHE Ⅱ score [16 (15, 20) vs 14 (15, 18), Z=2.093, P=0.036)] and longer stay in the ICU [3 (1, 10) d vs 1 (1, 7.5) d, Z=2.013, P=0.044]. Regression analysis showed that APACHE Ⅱ score was a risk factor associated with complications (OR=1.771, P=0.01).

Conclusions

The main reason for elderly trauma patients to stay in the ICU is tumble injuries, followed by traffic accident injuries. In addition to age, patients with a high APACHE II score have longer ICU stays and a higher complication rate.

表1 143例老年创伤患者基线情况[例(%)]
表2 老年创伤重症患者受伤机制及类型[例(%)]
表3 老年创伤重症患者不同受伤机制ISS、APACHE II、ICU时间、住院时间及好转出院率的比较
表4 老年创伤重症患者不同年龄ISS、APACHE Ⅱ、住院时间、好转出院的比较
表5 老年创伤重症患者并发症危险因素的Logistic回归分析
1
Gowing R, Jain MK. Injury patterns and outcomes associated with elderly trauma victims in Kingston, Ontario [J]. Can J Surg, 2007, 50(6): 437-444.
2
Babu GR, Mahapatra T, Detels R. Job stress and hypertension in younger software professionals in India [J]. Indian J Occup Environ Med, 2013, 17(3): 101-107.
3
Bonne S, Schuerer DJ. Trauma in the older adult:epidemiology and evolving geriatric trauma principles [J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2013, 29(1): 137-150.
4
Bortz KL. Creating a geriatric-focused model of care in trauma with geriatric education [J]. J Trauma Nurs, 2015, 22(6): 301-305.
5
Bakhshi FR, Mao M, Shajahan AN, et al. Nitrosation-dependent caveolin 1 osphorylation, ubiquitination, and degradation and its association with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension [J]. Pulm Circ, 2013, 3(4): 816-830.
6
Rau CS, Lin TS, Wu SC, et al. Geriatric hospitalizations in fall-related injuries [J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2014, 22: 63.
7
Day J. Population projections of the united states by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1995 to 2050. In: US Bureau of the Census. Current Population Reports [M]. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office, 1996: 25-1130.
8
2010年第六次全国人口普查主要数据公报(第1号) [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2011, 19(8): 511-512.
9
杜鹏. 中国老年人口健康状况分析 [J]. 人口与经济, 2013(6): 3-9.
10
Konda SR, Lack WD, Seymour RB, et al. Mechanism of Injury Differentiates Risk Factors for Mortality in Geriatric Trauma Patients [J]. J Orth Trauma, 2015, 29(7): 331-336.
11
Pepe PE. Current issues in resuscitative trauma management: an overview [J] .Curr Opin Crit Care, 2001, 7(6): 409-412.
12
Lane P, Sorondo B, Kelly JJ. Geriatric Trauma Patients-Are They Receiving Trauma Center Care? [J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2003, 10(3): 244-250.
13
林翔,魏蔚. 创伤重度程度评分法在老年创伤患者急诊救治中的应用 [J]. 中国老年学, 2012, 32(7): 1511-1512.
14
亚俊. 对急诊科老年严重性创伤患者进行综合急救治疗的效果分析 [J]. 当代医药论丛, 2015, 13(5): 174-175.
15
谢江宁,梁亚鹏,苗振军. 急诊滞留时间对老年创伤患者生存状况的影响 [J]. 中国老年学, 2016, 36(6): 1446-1447.
16
Victorino GP, Chong TJ, Pal JD. Trauma in the elderly patient [J]. Arch Surg, 2003, 138(10): 1093-1098.
17
刘华,李兵,阮海林, 等. 不同年龄段急性创伤患者的临床特征分析 [J]. 广西医学, 2015, 37(3): 372-374.
18
尹其翔,梁亚鹏,刘志帧. 多发伤急诊死亡危险因素及死因分析 [J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2015, 16(8): 591-593.
19
朱鋆. 老年严重多发伤急诊救治结局分析 [J]. 现代预防医学, 2012, 39(10): 2616-2619.
20
张宪,赵晓东. 精准评估老年创伤,减少临床漏诊误诊 [J]. 临床误诊误治, 2017, 30(5): 106-109.
21
Demetriades D, Murray J, Martin M, et al. Pedestrians injured by automobiles:relationship of age to injury type and severity [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2004, 199(3): 382-387.
22
陆一鸣,於平. 在我国建立创伤急救新模式已迫在眉睫 [J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2013, 14(1): 1-3.
23
郑琦涵,岳茂兴,李瑛. 快速反应有效救治的创伤外科急救新模式 [J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2010, 19(12): 1333-1334.
24
王福权. 老年四肢骨折的内固定治疗 [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 1992, 27(9): 60.
25
杨思明,谢江帆,马奎, 等. 老年人创伤特点及创伤后重要器官修复再生的研究进展 [J].感染、炎症、修复, 2016, 17(2): 126-129.
26
闫萍,李传祥. 中国老年人医疗费用的负担水平及变化趋势 [J]. 中国老年学, 2013, 33(16): 3935-3939.
[1] 郁慧杰. 科学、高效、规范——嘉兴区域严重创伤救治体系建设经验[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 1-.
[2] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[3] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[4] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[5] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[6] 赵月, 田坤, 张宗明, 郭震天, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓. 降钙素原对老年急性重度胆囊炎发生的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[7] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[8] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[9] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[10] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[11] 王如海, 王绅, 张敏, 李春, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 李习珍. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后短期死亡风险的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 285-291.
[12] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
[15] 周倩妹, 王宪娥, 徐筱, 老慧琳, 赵欣悦, 胡菁颖. 多元化系统护理对老年人群牙周健康指标影响的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 500-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要