切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 415 -419. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2024.04.015

综述

甲状腺木乃伊结节于多模态超声下的研究进展
卫星彤1, 李昊昌1,(), 赵欣1   
  1. 1. 010050 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学附属医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-17 出版日期:2024-04-15
  • 通信作者: 李昊昌

Progress in diagnosis of mummified thyroid nodules by multimodal ultrasound imaging

Xingtong Wei1, Haochang Li1,(), Xin Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China
  • Received:2024-01-17 Published:2024-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Haochang Li
引用本文:

卫星彤, 李昊昌, 赵欣. 甲状腺木乃伊结节于多模态超声下的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-419.

Xingtong Wei, Haochang Li, Xin Zhao. Progress in diagnosis of mummified thyroid nodules by multimodal ultrasound imaging[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 415-419.

甲状腺木乃伊结节是具有恶性征象的良性结节,在高频声像图上与甲状腺乳头状癌有类似的表现如低回声、边界欠清晰、纵横比大于1、微钙化等,二者声像图虽表现相似但成因不同。另外也有特异性较高的声像图表现,如进行性缩小、黑白双晕征和连续完整的蛋壳样钙化。然而有时单纯使用高频超声对木乃伊结节的鉴别诊断有困难。随着超声弹性成像及超声造影在甲状腺结节诊断上的运用,可分别对木乃伊结节的硬度及微血管灌注进行全面评估,从而提高超声诊断的准确性,来避免进行过度的有创诊断。

Mummified thyroid nodules are benign nodules with malignant signs, which share some similar features to papillary thyroid carcinoma on high frequency sonography, such as low echo, ill-defined margins, taller-than-wide shape, and microcalcification. Although the sonograms of the two are similar, their causes are different. However, there are also some specific sonographic manifestations, such as progressive shrinking over time, regular peripheral black and white halos, and eggshell calcification. Nevertheless, it is sometimes difficult to make a diagnosis of mummified thyroid nodules by high frequency ultrasound alone. With the rapid development and improvement of ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, the hardness and microvascular perfusion of mummified nodules can be comprehensively evaluated, thus improving the accuracy of ultrasonic diagnosis and avoid excessive invasive diagnosis.

1
Uppal N, Collins R, James B. Thyroid nodules: global, economic, and personal burdens [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023,14: 1113977.
2
Li Y, Jin C, Li J, et al. Prevalence of thyroid nodules in China: A health examination cohort-based study [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021,12: 676144.
3
Alexander EK, Cibas ES. Diagnosis of thyroid nodules [J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2022,10(7): 533-539.
4
Peng Q, Niu C, Zhang Q, et al. Mummified thyroid nodules: conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound features [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2019,38(2): 441-452.
5
Lacout A, Chevenet C, Marcy PY. Mummified thyroid syndrome [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016,206(4): 837-845.
6
Ren J, Baek JH, Chung SR, et al. Degenerating thyroid nodules: ultrasound diagnosis, clinical significance, and management [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2019,20(6): 947-955.
7
Park JY, Choi W, Hong AR, et al. A comprehensive assessment of the harms of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid nodules: A systematic review [J]. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul), 2023,38(1): 104-116.
8
Grani G, Lamartina L, Ascoli V, et al. Reducing the number of unnecessary thyroid biopsies while improving diagnostic accuracy: toward the “Right” TIRADS [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019,104(1): 95-102.
9
Fresilli D, David E, Pacini P, et al. Thyroid nodule characterization: How to assess the malignancy risk update of the literature [J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021,11(8): 1374.
10
Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee [J]. J Am Coll Radiol, 2017,14(5): 587-595.
11
Zhou J, Yin L, Wei X, et al. 2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: the C-TIRADS [J]. Endocrine, 2020,70(2): 256-279.
12
亓鹏, 张华伟. C-TIRADS对甲状腺囊性、囊实性机化皱缩结节与恶性结节的超声鉴别诊断[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2022,30(4): 316-320.
13
Rossi ED, Pantanowitz L, Hornick JL. A worldwide journey of thyroid cancer incidence centred on tumour histology [J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2021,9(4): 193-194.
14
Kim SS, Kim MR, Mok JY, et al. Benign cystic nodules may have ultrasonographic features mimicking papillary thyroid carcinoma during interval changes [J]. Endocr J, 2011,58(8): 633-638.
15
黄莉, 赵艳娜, 顾建华, 等. 超声检查在甲状腺囊实性结节随访中的应用价值 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020,17(12): 1189-1192.
16
Lee HY, Baek JH, Ha E J, et al. Malignant-looking thyroid nodules with size reduction: core needle biopsy results [J]. Ultrasonography, 2016,35(4): 327-334.
17
中华医学会超声医学分会浅表器官和血管学组, 中国甲状腺与乳腺超声人工智能联盟. 2020甲状腺结节超声恶性危险分层中国指南: C-TIRADS [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2021,30(3): 185-200.
18
黄幸芝, 闵翔, 周爱云, 等. 自发性甲状腺皱缩结节与甲状腺乳头状癌的超声鉴别诊断研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2021,56(1): 75-78.
19
Rago T, Vitti P. Risk stratification of thyroid nodules: from ultrasound features to TIRADS [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022,14(3).
20
Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study [J]. Radiology, 2008,247(3): 762-770.
21
Peng Y, Zhou W, Zhan WW, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of differential diagnosis between degenerating cystic thyroid nodules and papillary thyroid microcarcinomas [J]. World J Surg, 2017,41(10): 2538-2544.
22
曹海艳, 张文, 荣新, 等. 常规超声和超声造影鉴别诊断甲状腺皱缩结节与乳头状癌 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2021,37(9): 1302-1306.
23
杨捷, 余晓梅, 葛嘉, 等. 甲状腺乳头状癌和自发性甲状腺皱缩结节的超声特点分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2022,38(10): 1088-1092.
24
王志宏, 张浩, 张平, 等. 甲状腺囊实性皱缩结节临床特点分析 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020,40(1): 117-119.
25
Lacout A, Chevenet C, Marcy PY. Suspicious thyroid nodule management with nondiagnostic results at cytologic examination: How to diagnosis mummified benign thyroid nodules [J]. Radiology, 2015,277(1): 303-304.
26
Tan XQ, Qian L, Wang Y. Distinguishing mummified thyroid nodules from malignant thyroid nodules [J]. Med Ultrason, 2019,21(3): 251-256.
27
赵宜凡, 邹朋林, 陶宇晨, 等. 甲状腺皱缩结节的超声分型及其演变 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2021,30(12): 1046-1051.
28
Kim BK, Lee EM, Kim JH, et al. Relationship between ultrasonographic and pathologic calcification patterns in papillary thyroid cancer [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018,97(41): e12675.
29
Shin HS, Na DG, Paik W, et al. Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules with macrocalcification and rim calcification based on ultrasound patterns [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2021,22(4): 663-671.
30
陈思洁, 彭清海, 刘明辉, 等. 甲状腺木乃伊结节的常规超声、声触诊组织量化成像及超声造影表现 [J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2020,22(1): 25-29.
31
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2016,26(1): 1-133.
32
李文, 杨波, 朱绘绘, 等. 常规超声联合微血管成像技术在甲状腺皱缩结节与乳头状癌鉴别诊断中的价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2022,38(10): 1081-1084.
33
Sigrist R, Liau J, Kaffas AE, et al. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications [J]. Theranostics, 2017,7(5): 1303-1329.
34
吴松年, 何建娣, 蒋天安, 等. 声触诊组织成像量化技术鉴别诊断甲状腺TI-RADS 4类结节的临床研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016,25(7): 573-578.
35
Greis C. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2011,49(1-4): 137-149.
36
Zhang J, Zhang X, Meng Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: An updated meta-analysis with comprehensive heterogeneity analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2020,15(4): e231775.
37
Chen S, Tang K, Gong Y, et al. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in mummified thyroid nodules [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022,13: 850698.
38
程颢, 田燕, 冯海波, 等. 超声造影在评价TI-RADS 4类甲状腺囊性皱缩结节中的临床应用[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2020,36(7): 595-598.
39
洪玉蓉. 超声造影定量分析在甲状腺皱缩结节评估中的应用: 2019年浙江省医学会超声医学学术大会 [C]. 中国浙江嘉兴, 2019.
40
Zhang H, Tan X, Qian L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: An effective method for noninvasive diagnosis of mummified thyroid nodules [J]. Int J Endocrinol, 2022,2022: 4289708.
41
Lin ZM, Wen Q, Yan CX, et al. Combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and strain elastography to assess cytologically non-diagnostic thyroid nodules [J]. Oncol Lett, 2019,18(6): 6845-6851.
42
林燕霞, 吴才标, 王小霞. 实时超声造影定量分析对体检初次发现肝脏局灶性病变的诊断价值分析 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023,17(2): 176-181.
[1] 马旦杰, 黄品同, 徐琛, 周芳芳, 潘敏强. 超声造影LI-RADS系统联合甲胎蛋白对有无高危因素背景人群肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 288-296.
[2] 罗敏华, 王文平, 孔文韬. 肝脏炎性假瘤的超声造影表现及其诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 297-303.
[3] 刘逸群, 朱家安, 熊钰, 辛雨薇, 曲琳琳, 杨力, 李文雪, 田辉. 超声造影定量分析大鼠肝急性移植物抗宿主病的实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 75-81.
[4] 马琳, 彭驰涵, 朱晓霞, 范红霞, 杨家丽, 罗燕. 超声造影定量评估大鼠70%肝切除后不同类型门静脉狭窄残肝微循环灌注的实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 83-89.
[5] 覃斯, 刘一铭, 周静雯, 李昀芸, 刘广健. Sonazoid®超声造影不同参数成像效果的体外研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1287-1293.
[6] 陈广兰, 胡守容, 郭蓉, 张丹丹, 贺玉梅, 张蕾, 陈小清, 华琪, 张元吉, 林燕秋, 王慧芳. 经直肠双平面高频超声评估MRKH综合征腹膜代阴道成形术后人工阴道的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1132-1138.
[7] 任新平, 郑丽丽, 冯梅晶, 肖俊飞, 林艳艳, 詹维伟. 高帧频超声造影对慢性肝病患者≤3 cm肝局灶性病变定性诊断的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1119-1124.
[8] 李秋洋, 赵萍, 李静波, 宋禄达, 朱嘉宁, 姜波, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影对小肾透明细胞癌假包膜的评价价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1114-1118.
[9] 池梦婷, 赵萍, 李静波, 朱嘉宁, 宋禄达, 罗渝昆, 李秋洋. 高帧频超声造影在膀胱癌分级及分期中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1107-1113.
[10] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[11] 刘国安, 陈一杰, 赖江琼, 余丽平, 康春梅. 高频超声联合多普勒超声诊断腹外疝的临床价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 106-110.
[12] 曹建辉, 冯斌, 黄伟伟, 张超. 超声造影在乳腺BI-RADS 4A类结节诊断及穿刺活检中的应用价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-368.
[13] 赵欣, 李昊昌, 卫星彤. 多模态超声在非肿块型乳腺病变中的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 407-410.
[14] 黄宏山, 陈成彩. 经淋巴管超声造影在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结诊断中的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[15] 杜倩, 张曼, 李丽, 马晓丽. 细胞蜡块技术在甲状腺细针穿刺病理诊断中的价值研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1071-1074.
阅读次数
全文


摘要