Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12): 1034-1037. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.12.016

Special Issue:

• Educational Training • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application effects of two non-traditional teaching methods in general surgery teaching

Xiaodong Yang1,(), Yong Wu1, Bei Li1, Tengfei He1, Chungen Xing1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China.
  • Received:2020-07-03 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2021-03-23
  • Contact: Xiaodong Yang

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) and management by objective (MBO) in clinical teaching of general surgery.

Methods

From July 2019 to December 2019, 48 clinical medicine undergraduates were selected from our hospital for clinical probation in general surgery, They were randomly divided into traditional teaching group, PBL teaching group, MBO teaching group, and non-traditional comprehensive teaching group (PBL+MBO group), with 12 undergraduates in each group. At the end of the two-month probation period, the theoretical knowledge and practical ability of the four groups of trainees were tested. In addition, the trainees were requested to evaluate the teaching effect and the patients were requested to evaluate the satisfaction with trainees.

Results

In the PBL group and MBO group, students' scores in the theoretical knowledge test and practical operation test (PBL: 86.13±5.78 and 82.91±6.51; MBO: 85.47±7.50 and 84.36±6.04, respectively), as well as trainees' evaluation of teaching effect (91.17±6.83 and 90.43±7.49) were higher than those in the traditional teaching group (81.05±6.34, 77.45±5.23 and 86.95±5.72, respectively) (P<0.05); the scores of the PBL+MBO group (90.26±5.91, 88.02±4.97 and 94.02±5.01, respectively) were higher than those of the PBL group and MBO group (P<0.05). The satisfaction of patients with trainees in the PBL group, MBO group, and PBL+MBO group was higher than that in the traditional teaching group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application effect of non-traditional teaching methods in general surgery teaching is better than that of traditional teaching method. Moreover, the combination of different kinds of non-traditional teaching methods has a synergistic effect.

Key words: Clinical teaching of general surgery, Problem-based learning, Management by objective

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322622 E-mail: zhlcyszz@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd