| 1 |
中华医学会结核病学分会. 老年肺结核诊断与治疗专家共识(2023版) [J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2023, 46(11): 1068-1084.
|
| 2 |
宋言峥. 重视肺结核的外科治疗 [J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2018, 21(4): 323-326.
|
| 3 |
戴洁, 周逸鸣, 沙巍, 等. 肺结核外科治疗进展 [J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2021, 37(3): 178-183.
|
| 4 |
中华医学会结核病学分会. 中国耐多药和利福平耐药肺结核外科治疗专家共识(2022年版) [J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2023, 46(2): 111-120.
|
| 5 |
Marfina GY, Vladimirov KB, Avetisian AO, et al. Bilateral cavitary multidrug- or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: role of surgery [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2018, 53(3): 618-624.
|
| 6 |
Yablonskii PK, Kudriashov GG, Avetisyan AO. et al. Surgical resection in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2019, 29(1): 37-46.
|
| 7 |
Adebonojo SA. How prolonged is "prolonged air leak"? [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1995, 59(2): 549-550.
|
| 8 |
Dugan KC, Laxmanan B, Murgu S, et al. Management of persistent air leaks [J]. Chest, 2017, 152(2): 417-423.
|
| 9 |
Zaraca F, Crisci R, Augustin F, et al. Prolonged air leak after lung surgery: prediction, prevention and management [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2023, 15(2): 835-838.
|
| 10 |
Verkoulen KCHA, Laven IEWG, Daemen JHT, et al. From data to prediction: Digital chest drain insights into postoperative recovery after lung cancer surgery [J]. Lung Cancer, 2025, 202: 108486.
|
| 11 |
Chang PC, Chen KH, Jhou HJ, et al. Promising effects of digital chest tube drainage system for pulmonary resection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(4): 512.
|
| 12 |
Arai H, Tajiri M, Kameda Y, et al. Evaluation of a digital drainage system (Thopaz) in over 250 cases at a single site: a retrospective case-control study [J]. Clin Respir J, 2018, 12(4): 1454-1459.
|
| 13 |
Aldaghlawi F, Kurman JS, Lilly JA, et al. A systematic review of digital vs analog drainage for air leak after surgical resection or spontaneous pneumothorax [J]. Chest, 2020, 157(5): 1346-1353.
|
| 14 |
Takamochi K, Endo M, Funai K, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of -8 cm H2O vs -15 cm H2O intrathoracic pressure digital thoracic drainage for air leaks after anatomic pulmonary resection [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2026, 121(4): 811-818.
|
| 15 |
Embalabala A, Mitzman B, Crabtree T. Digital pleural versus analog drainage devices for postoperative management of patients after pulmonary resection [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2025, 67(Supplement_1): i31-i40.
|
| 16 |
Evans JM, Ray A, Dale M, et al. Thopaz+ portable digital system for managing chest drains: a NICE medical technology guidance [J]. Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 2019, 17(3): 285-294.
|
| 17 |
陈东来, 西尔买买提·卡德尔, 施哲, 等. 数字化胸腔引流系统用于肺部手术后难治性持续性漏气的疗效观察 [J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2017, 20(12): 833-836.
|
| 18 |
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. The benefits of continuous and digital air leak assessment after elective pulmonary resection: a prospective study [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008, 86(2): 396-401.
|
| 19 |
Takamochi K, Nojiri S, Oh S, et al. Comparison of digital and traditional thoracic drainage systems for postoperative chest tube management after pulmonary resection: a prospective randomized trial [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 155(4): 1834-1840.
|
| 20 |
Spálová L, Adamčík L, Duda M, et al. Comparing the use of the medela thopaz+ digital drainage system and conventional thoracic drainage techniques in lung resections for cancer [J]. Rozhl Chir, 2025, 104(10): 451-457.
|
| 21 |
Gilbert S, McGuire AL, Maghera S, et al. Randomized trial of digital versus analog pleural drainage in patients with or without a pulmonary air leak after lung resection [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 150(5): 1243-1249.
|